Only in German
Only in French
Original language
02.12.2024
Isabel Schuler
Isabel Schuler
Ivo Scherrer
Ivo Scherrer
Flurina Wäspi

Between Conflict and Compromise

Between Conflict and Compromise

How polarized is Switzerland? Which issues are especially divisive? And when does polarization become a threat to democracy? In a representative survey, Pro Futuris investigates the state of polarization in Switzerland—and explores what continues to hold society together despite differences. With this study, we aim to understand which issues and groups are most polarized and what effect this has on democratic behavior.
How polarized is Switzerland? Which issues are especially divisive? And when does polarization become a threat to democracy? In a representative survey, Pro Futuris investigates the state of polarization in Switzerland—and explores what continues to hold society together despite differences. With this study, we aim to understand which issues and groups are most polarized and what effect this has on democratic behavior.
How polarized is Switzerland? Which issues are especially divisive? And when does polarization become a threat to democracy? In a representative survey, Pro Futuris investigates the state of polarization in Switzerland—and explores what continues to hold society together despite differences. With this study, we aim to understand which issues and groups are most polarized and what effect this has on democratic behavior.
How polarized is Switzerland? A study series by Pro Futuris explores which topics divide society, when polarization becomes problematic—and what still unites us. Part 1 of the study.
How polarized is Switzerland? A study series by Pro Futuris explores which topics divide society, when polarization becomes problematic—and what still unites us. Part 1 of the study.
How polarized is Switzerland? A study series by Pro Futuris explores which topics divide society, when polarization becomes problematic—and what still unites us. Part 1 of the study.

Which political issues polarize Switzerland? Results from Part 1 of the study

A clear majority of 70% of respondents feel that social cohesion has declined in recent years. Opinions and emotions are particularly polarized around immigration, support for Ukraine, and pandemic measures.

On the question of whether immigration should be restricted or facilitated, affective polarization is especially pronounced: a significant share of the population feels very strong antipathy toward those in favor of more immigration.

The design of the welfare state, gender equality, and the protection of sexual minorities are the least emotionally polarizing issues. Notably, these topics are considered highly important by the population. Nearly 60% see the wealth gap as the strongest dividing line in Swiss society.

Climate protection and relations with the EU cause moderate levels of affective polarization.

SVP and SP voters are, on average, the most affectively polarized and express the strongest antipathy toward those with opposing views on the eight key issues. Older generations and politically active individuals are also more affectively polarized.

SVP voters consider themselves the least willing to compromise on all policy issues compared to voters of other parties. Across all age groups, young people report the highest willingness to compromise.

Partnerships

This project was implemented in collaboration with the following partners:
KPM Universität Bern
Together with the “E-Democracy” research group of the KPM Center for Public Management at the University of Bern, we conducted the representative population survey as part of the polarisation study series.
Mercator
The Mercator Switzerland Foundation supports and co-publishes the “Polarisation in Switzerland” study series and supports the projects “Companies for Democracy”, “Zukunftsrat U24” and its follow-up project.
KPM Universität Bern
Together with the “E-Democracy” research group of the KPM Center for Public Management at the University of Bern, we conducted the representative population survey as part of the polarisation study series.
Mercator
The Mercator Switzerland Foundation supports and co-publishes the “Polarisation in Switzerland” study series and supports the projects “Companies for Democracy”, “Zukunftsrat U24” and its follow-up project.
KPM Universität Bern
Together with the “E-Democracy” research group of the KPM Center for Public Management at the University of Bern, we conducted the representative population survey as part of the polarisation study series.
Mercator
The Mercator Switzerland Foundation supports and co-publishes the “Polarisation in Switzerland” study series and supports the projects “Companies for Democracy”, “Zukunftsrat U24” and its follow-up project.

Funding partnerships

Finanzierungs-partnerschaften

For the implementation of this project, we were able to count on the financial support of the following partners:
KPM Universität Bern
Together with the “E-Democracy” research group of the KPM Center for Public Management at the University of Bern, we conducted the representative population survey as part of the polarisation study series.
Mercator
The Mercator Switzerland Foundation supports and co-publishes the “Polarisation in Switzerland” study series and supports the projects “Companies for Democracy”, “Zukunftsrat U24” and its follow-up project.
Mercator Switzerland Foundation
The Mercator Switzerland Foundation supports and co-publishes the “Polarisation in Switzerland” study series and supports the projects “Companies for Democracy”, “Zukunftsrat U24” and its follow-up project.
Mercator
This is some text inside of a div block.
Opinion
|
18.02.2026

Die Schweiz braucht eine demokratische Medien- und Informationsinfrastruktur

Die Schweiz braucht eine demokratische Medien- und Informationsinfrastruktur

Während private Medien unter massivem wirtschaftlichem Druck stehen, fragmentieren soziale Plattformen und künstliche Intelligenz unsere Informationswelten fortlaufend. Damit die Schweizer Demokratie funktionieren kann, braucht sie jedoch eine verlässliche Informationsinfrastruktur. Ohne Institutionen, die einen gemeinsamen Realitätsbezug herstellen, wird es nicht möglich sein, die zugleich kontroversen und konstruktiven Debatten zu führen, die den Kern unserer Demokratie ausmachen.
Newsletter
|
20.01.2026

Pro Futuris remains a permanent part of the SSCG

Pro Futuris remains a permanent part of the SSCG

As part of its strategic development, SSCG has decided to continue Pro Futuris within the organisation on a permanent basis.
Media report
|
09.12.2025

La Liberté Interview mit Ivo Scherrer

La Liberté Interview mit Ivo Scherrer

La Suisse, si démocratique que ça? L’avis (et les nuances) de deux spécialistes
Opinion
|
06.10.2025

Mit deliberativen Formaten Demokratiedefizite in der Schweiz beheben

Mit deliberativen Formaten Demokratiedefizite in der Schweiz beheben

Die Schweiz bezeichnet sich gern als «beste Demokratie der Welt». Doch auch Demokratien, die auf ihre langjährigen demokratischen Traditionen stolz sind, stehen heute vor neuen Herausforderungen. Hier setzt die deliberative Demokratie an.

Newsletter

Isabel Schuler
Ivo Scherrer